17-2409 — ADRS | Arbitration Database

Level Playing FieldSign in

Outcome

Disposition: Pending
Prevailing Party: —
Initiating Party: Business
ADR Process: —

Dates

Filed: Apr 19, 2017
Closed: —
Hearing Type: —

Financials

	Consumer	Business
Claim Amount	—	—
Award Amount	—	—
Attorney Fees	—	—
Arbitration Fees	—	—

Parties

Arbitrator: Enrique Romero
Business: Lala's On Melrose, Inc.
Business: Lala's Studio City, Inc.
Business: Respondent
Consumer Attorney: Angel D. Pluas, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Brian G. Hannemann, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Joshua D. Milon, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Katey Doherty, Esq.
Attorney Firm: Hannemann Law Firm
Attorney Firm: Milon Pluas

Consumer Details

State: —
Self-Represented: —
Document Only: —
Salary Range: Employee Declined to Provide

Community Comments

Create a free account to save this case, add private notes, get notified of new case data, and share your experience.

Do you represent consumers in arbitration cases against Lala's On Melrose, Inc.? Feature your firm on cases like this. Sign in to inquire about sponsorship →