24-4248 — ADRS | Arbitration Database

Level Playing FieldSign in

Outcome

Disposition: Pending
Prevailing Party: —
Initiating Party: Consumer
ADR Process: —

Dates

Filed: Mar 10, 2023
Closed: —
Hearing Type: —

Financials

	Consumer	Business
Claim Amount	—	—
Award Amount	—	—
Attorney Fees	—	—
Arbitration Fees	—	—

Parties

Arbitrator: Jr., Thomas L. Willhite
Business: Rasier, LLC
Business: Rasier-CA, LLC
Business: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Consumer Attorney: Charles Moore, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Christina Le, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Gillian Wade, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Glenn Danas, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Michael Reese, Esq.
Consumer Attorney: Sara Avila, Esq.
Attorney Firm: Clarkson Law Firm, PC
Attorney Firm: Reese LLP
Attorney Firm: Wade Kilpela Slade LLP

Consumer Details

State: —
Self-Represented: —
Document Only: —

Community Comments

Create a free account to save this case, add private notes, get notified of new case data, and share your experience.

Do you represent consumers in arbitration cases against Rasier, LLC? Feature your firm on cases like this. Sign in to inquire about sponsorship →